Google and the innocent victim
Why do I bother, and why am I still amazed over these stupidities in US court orders and the consequences? One more for you: Rocky Mountain Bank (or rather one of its employees) sent out a mail to the wrong recipient at an gmail.com adress including personal information for 1325 customers. A big Oooops! This makes my brainwaves go in a direction: Why send that kind of information to a "nearly" anonymous mail server? I wouldn't send such a mail to someone who does not have their mail in a "trusted" domain like @bankdomain.com or @solicitor.com. And why the h*ll would Google comply to a request for closing that account? Is the person having that account really liable for receiving such a mail? Is it really his fault that a dumbass sends him confidential mail? Where did he go wrong?
Questions answered by this article. Yes... Google refused to close it down... and Yes... google complied to closing the account. Wow!
Update 2009-09-30: And apparently the innocent holder of the beforementioned Google mail account never even opened the damned mail! Guilty as hell :-P
Questions answered by this article. Yes... Google refused to close it down... and Yes... google complied to closing the account. Wow!
Update 2009-09-30: And apparently the innocent holder of the beforementioned Google mail account never even opened the damned mail! Guilty as hell :-P
Comments
Post a Comment